adapt hugo

hugo/content/ref/instr/polarized/polarized-non-perfect-ap/index.md → hugo/content/ex/instr/polarization/magnetic-layer-imperfect.md

 +++
-title = "Non-perfect polarizer + analyzer"
-weight = 40
+title = "Ditto, realistic instrument"
+weight = 11
 +++
 
 ### Polarized specular reflectometry with non-perfect polarizer and analyzer
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ results_mp = run_simulation(polarization = R3(0, -1, 0),
 The computed reflectivity looks like this:
 
 {{< galleryscg >}}
-{{< figscg src="/img/auto/specular/PolarizedNonperfectAnalyzerPolarizer.png" width="650px" caption="Reflectivity">}}
+{{< figscg src="/img/auto/specular/MagneticLayerImperfect.png" width="650px" caption="Reflectivity">}}
 {{< /galleryscg >}}
 
 Due to the different values for the polarizer and analyzer efficiency, we obtain
@@ -76,4 +76,4 @@ simulations presented by [Devishvili et al.](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4790717)
 
 Here is the complete example:
 
-{{< highlightfile file="Examples/specular/PolarizedNonperfectAnalyzerPolarizer.py" >}}
+{{< highlightfile file="Examples/specular/MagneticLayerImperfect.py" >}}