From 1d7309a5f3d467e5af48c7e46975eeb83b22afe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Joachim Wuttke (o)" <j.wuttke@fz-juelich.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:38:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] adapt hugo
---
.../instr/polarization/magnetic-layer-imperfect.md} | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename hugo/content/{ref/instr/polarized/polarized-non-perfect-ap/index.md => ex/instr/polarization/magnetic-layer-imperfect.md} (92%)
diff --git a/hugo/content/ref/instr/polarized/polarized-non-perfect-ap/index.md b/hugo/content/ex/instr/polarization/magnetic-layer-imperfect.md
similarity index 92%
rename from hugo/content/ref/instr/polarized/polarized-non-perfect-ap/index.md
rename to hugo/content/ex/instr/polarization/magnetic-layer-imperfect.md
index 02467681af6..0db125efb34 100644
--- a/hugo/content/ref/instr/polarized/polarized-non-perfect-ap/index.md
+++ b/hugo/content/ex/instr/polarization/magnetic-layer-imperfect.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+++
-title = "Non-perfect polarizer + analyzer"
-weight = 40
+title = "Ditto, realistic instrument"
+weight = 11
+++
### Polarized specular reflectometry with non-perfect polarizer and analyzer
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ results_mp = run_simulation(polarization = R3(0, -1, 0),
The computed reflectivity looks like this:
{{< galleryscg >}}
-{{< figscg src="/img/auto/specular/PolarizedNonperfectAnalyzerPolarizer.png" width="650px" caption="Reflectivity">}}
+{{< figscg src="/img/auto/specular/MagneticLayerImperfect.png" width="650px" caption="Reflectivity">}}
{{< /galleryscg >}}
Due to the different values for the polarizer and analyzer efficiency, we obtain
@@ -76,4 +76,4 @@ simulations presented by [Devishvili et al.](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4790717)
Here is the complete example:
-{{< highlightfile file="Examples/specular/PolarizedNonperfectAnalyzerPolarizer.py" >}}
+{{< highlightfile file="Examples/specular/MagneticLayerImperfect.py" >}}
--
GitLab